Tags
18th Century, Austenpunk, blackpowder, chateau, country seat, dreadpunk, Eighteenth Century, First Empire, French Directory, French Revolution, Georgian, Ghastly Affair, gothic game, Gothic Gaming, Gothic Horror, Gothic Literature, Gothic Romance, Gothick, Gothique, Historical, Historical Gaming, History, Louis Seize, Louis XV, Louis XVI, mannerpunk, manor house, Napoleonic, nineteenth century, Regency, Romance, Romantic Age, Romantic Horror, Romantic-era, Romanticism, schauerroman, stately home, steampunk
Historical painting occupied (along with religious painting) the most prestigious place among the accepted hierarchy of subjects that reigned in Western art before the 20th century. It was praised as the greatest and most serious type of art by critics and philosophers of the 18th century, who looked down upon the more popular portrait, landscape, and still life paintings that actually occupied most of the wall space in the homes of collectors.
It was common before the 19th century to depict historical figures in contemporary costumes. For example, Nero might be depicted in the garb of the 15th century king, or El Cid in historically inaccurate plate armor. Painters also commonly increased their sales by putting bare-breasted and nude women into every scene that could plausibly (or even possibly) include them. And of course, painters were always expected to portray events in a way that reflected the values and prejudices of their wealthy patrons. A historically accurate historical painting would actually have been quite unusual!
Historical paintings can be great clues to the secret history of the family inhabiting a Grand House such as Highdark Hall, or indications as to their actual political ( or religious) allegiance. A large amount of historical paintings present in a collection can warn PCs of the owner’s social pretensions, or intellectual snobbery. A historical painting might even be supernatural portal between the past and present!
|
d20 |
The strange thing about the depiction is… |
|
1 – 4 |
nothing – everything about the painting appears perfectly ordinary and conventional. |
|
5 |
the figures appear to be of different racial or ethnic backgrounds than reported in orthodox history. |
|
6 |
one of the famous men of history is painted as having actually been a woman (or vice versa). |
|
7 |
everyone is painted with animal heads. |
|
8 |
the painter has included the figure of Satan snickering. |
|
9 |
everyone is nude – even if the painting depicts a battle or coronation! |
|
10 |
the colors are utterly bizarre and garish. |
|
11 |
if you look away, and then look again at the painting, the figures look as if they have changed positions. |
|
12 |
it appears to be the work of an otherwise unknown master. |
|
13 |
it is so realistic-looking you feel as if you could reach in and touch the figures. |
|
14 |
it done in a flat and stylized manner. |
|
15 |
it seems impossible to ascertain what medium was used. |
|
16 |
it seems almost self-luminous. |
|
17 |
the presence of several mythological creatures. |
|
18 |
the side usually accepted as heroic is painted as if they were villainous, and their opponents are depicted heroically. |
|
19 |
one of the figures clearly has the face of a Player Character. |
|
20 |
the series of seemingly random numbers and letters that have been incorporated into the composition. |